March 2, 2010

Feds DOT Farm Tractors

Related — walterj 7:39 pm

The feds are overstepping their juristiction attempting to impose DOT regulations on farmers for tractors and other farm vehicles. Please write to your Congressional critters to oppose and stop this nonsense.

Here’s a look at what the federal government has proposed:

– Age restrictions: No one under the age of 18 will be able to drive a farm vehicle, including implements, with a combined weight of more than 17,000 pounds.
– Medical certification: Drivers must receive a valid medical certificate to determine if they are physically qualified to drive. Drivers of farm vehicles weighing more than 17,000 pounds will also need a certification whenever the truck is operated more than 150 miles from the farm.
– Driver’s logs: Drivers will be subject to similar hours of service as trucking companies. Those standards include break time and keeping a log of driver’s activity.
– Vehicle inspection: Farmers will be required to conduct pre-trip inspections and complete written post-trip safety reports.
-Farm and Dairy News

Forcing farmers to act like long distance truckers will destroy small farms. Bureaucrats are ceaselessly looking for more ways to extend their domain by taking away our traditional rights to live our lives.

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy Certified Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


April 13, 2009

NYTimes Op-Ed: Free Range vs CAFO

Related — walterj 9:53 am

I’ve been getting a lot of calls and letters from people concerned about the highly miss-informational New York Times article Free-Range Trichinosis. I have written an Op-Ed reply to it and sent it to the NYTimes which may be published but I can’t publish that here since they want first publication rights. However, I can cover some of the basic points.

It is important to realize several things:

1) The NYT article is an opinion piece. As such one should not expect it to contain facts nor should you expect that the NYTimes has fact checked the article. It would be nice if it were factual but this is reality and it is not. It is an opinion piece.

2) The author of the NYT opinion piece is a historian, not scientist. He gets grant funding and is employed by Texas State University, a bastion of Big Ag livestock which has a lot of support for and from Confinement Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). Keep in mind that he has his axe to grind, possibly paid for by someone else.

3) The non-scientific article presented in the Op-Ed piece was based on research funded by Big Ag (e.g., National Pork Producers Council (NPPC), Pork Board) designed to show the results they wanted to demonstrate. One can do faith based research to show anything. Heck, you can prove reading the NYTimes causes cancer of the brain if you design the study right. And then you can have hysteria and fear mongering about the false results, just like this Op-Ed piece does. The reality is there are European studies that show the opposite of what the opinion piece clamed. They demonstrate that pastured livestock are safer and less laden with bacteria than confinement raised livestock.

4) The non-scientist, opinionated Op-Ed author conviently ignores that the very deadly disease MRSA is coming out of confinement feeding operations, not pasture based operations. MRSA kills tens of thousands of people a year but the NPPC doesn’t want you thinking about that so they are presenting spin, illusion and slight of hand with this distracting Op-Ed piece.

5) As to the Op-Ed author’s worry about Trichinosis, realize again he was exaggerating. They didn’t find any Trichinosis. What they found were two pigs on pasture with “seropositive for Trichinella” which is a totally different thing and could have been triggered by exposure to non Trichinosis causing species. According to the MayoClinic: “Trichinosis usually isn’t serious and often gets better on its own.” The fact is Trichinosis is extremely rare, testable, treatable, killed by moderate cooking or freezing and virtually extinct in the USA. This was a non-issue, a red-herring, and simple fear mongering by CAFOs to make pastured pork look bad. It’s the “If you can’t win, beat up your little competitor’s” theory of marketing.

6) Both the confinement and the pastured animals had the almost the bacteria counts despite McWilliam’s exaggerations and hype. The minor difference between the populations was insignificant and all of this hysteria is irrelevant because…

7) USDA Inspected slaughter HACCP/PR and SSOP regulations and routines, also followed by state inspections, all assume that all incoming livestock are contaminated with the bacteria in question so steps are taken to prevent disease from getting into the food supply. When those steps are followed the food is safe. Here’s the reality check: virtually all of the food born illness and disease comes from Big Ag and Mega-Processors after the food leaves the farm. Think about the recent problems. Tens of millions of pounds of recalled beef, millions of heads of spinach, peppers, peanuts and pistachios. This didn’t come from your local pastured pork producer. The problems, and MRSA, originated and spread from Big Ag and Mega-Processors.

There are a lot of other problems with McWilliams’ pseudo-science Op-Ed piece that I won’t dissect here. It is unfortunate that Big Ag feels the need to hire media spin experts, such as historian McWilliams, to distort the truth. It makes you wonder what they’re so afraid of…

If you want healthy food, raise it yourself, buy it from someone you know or buy it from someone who knows someone you know. The closer the connection you have to your food the better off you’ll be.

I also recommend a healthy dose of skepticism while reading the Op-Ed page. Same for everything your read. Check the sources. Investigate. Think. Don’t be led to the slaughter.

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy Certified Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


April 9, 2009

Big Pharma Taint

Related — walterj 12:01 am


Boar Balls on a Cold Winter’s Day

Those are a set of bowling ball size ornaments on the back end of a fully equipped north bound boar. With a harem of 30 ladies to keep happy they aren’t just decorations. Of course he’s got balls since he’s a working boar. What surprises visitors to our farm is that all the male pigs here have their balls. We don’t castrate the pigs we raise because we have no boar taint in our herds. This saves the little piglets a lot of pain on top of the fact that castration is a chore that nobody here enjoys, pigs included.

Big Pharma is trying to convince farmers and consumers that uncastrated male pigs taste bad. This is not true - The reality is that real, independent scientific research shows that only a very small minority of (older) boars have taint - the vast majority of market age boars do not have taint so castration and the new Pfizer vaccine Improvac are unnecessary.

Boar Taint Facts
Taint is an unpleasant, musky urine like flavor and smell in the meat that is caused by two chemicals, skatole and androstenone, which can be found in both male pigs and occasionally in female pigs (gilts & sows). Taint is primarily deposited in the fat and most noticeable when cooking so it is simple to test for by using a soldering iron on a piece of fat after slaughter. About 25% of the human population can not detect taint so the taint tester needs to first be validated.

According to some researchers, breeds such as the lighter colored ones like Yorkshire are very low in taint while some of the newer commercial breeds are higher in taint. Boar taint is caused by poor genetics, over crowding, poor sanitation, low fiber diets, feed choices, management issues and other problems.

Slaughtering pigs at a normal market age and weight also virtually always prevents boar taint. We have tested many hundreds of boars up to 30 months of age on our farm without ever finding any taint in them. Castration isn’t necessary so we don’t do it any longer for our herds. If a farmer has a herd where boar taint is present, the taint can be bred out of the pigs and improved with better management practices.

Boar tainted meat is traditionally used trimmed to the lean and combined with fat from beef or sows for making spicy sausages, pepperoni and such which mask the flavor. Old country, low-tech solutions to the occasional strong tasting boar. Some people like the stronger flavor.

Over the years I’ve done a lot of research on this topic here at our farm. Our herd doesn’t have the boar taint, we don’t castrate and the pork from our boars sells like crazy to individuals and in stores and restaurants. It would be a shame to waste money on an unnecessary vaccine injecting extra chemicals into the meat. For more details of my research on this topic see:

NoBoarTaint.org
Boart Taint Articles

which will give you a list of articles about boar taint and lead to further scientific research on the topic of boar taint.

I would strongly suggest that farmers test for boar taint in their swine breeding herds before they spend a lot of money on anti-taint vaccines for their hogs. In the unlikely event they do have taint, then they should look into how to improve their feeding, management and genetics to get rid of it before resorting to costly vaccines that will be necessary for all future pigs if they travel down that path. Let’s humanely raise pigs with NoWeirdStuff in them.

Of course, none of this is going to make money for Big Pharma. If consumers and farmers know the truth then it is hard to justify the high cost of vaccination against a non-problem. Who’s going to be willing to fork over money for unnecessary vaccines unless they’re properly scared into wanting it? Who wants to pay the resulting higher price for food that has been injected with one more chemical? Not me!

One interesting question is that it is not clear if Pfizer’s new anti-taint vaccine Improvac will protect against both kinds of taint since taint is actually caused by two different chemicals, one produced in the testes & adrenal glands (androstenone) and the other taint caused by bacteria in the small intestine (skatole). From what I’ve read, Improvac merely suppresses testicular function and thus only protects against the androstenone from the testes. This ignores the androstenone produced in the adrenal glands above the kidneys and it ignores the skatole induced taint. Thus the vaccine is not 100% effective at preventing “boar taint”. I’m sure they’ll have appropriate disclaimers that keep them from having to be liable for those few remaining cases of taint on farms that depend on their vaccine.

Another interesting point is that when giving injections it is not all that rare for farmers to accidentally inject themselves. In a report by the European Medicine’s Agency it says:

Accidental self- injection may produce similar effects in people to those seen in pigs. The risk of these effects is greater after a second or subsequent accidental injection than after a first injection.

After a lot of Googling around I also found this expanded a bit on Pfizer’s web site:

accidental self-injection may produce similar effects in people to those seen in pigs. These may include a temporary reduction in sexual hormones and reproductive functions in both men and women and an adverse effect on pregnancy. The risk of these effects will be greater after a second or subsequent accidental injection than after a first injection. The product label advises anyone who has received an accidental self-injection to seek medical attention immediately and not to use the product in the future.

Apparently even women are susceptible to this issue. So if you use Improvac I would strongly suggest that you have already had any children you plan before using this product - You may not get another chance.

Another big problem I see with this vaccination is that these same Big Pharma companies may covertly, or overtly, aid the animal liberation and animal rights groups in pushing through laws banning castration. Big Pharma would benefit from a ban on castration because that will further their sales agenda and profits since so many people believe the Boar Taint Myth. While I am against the practice of castration I am even more against governmental interference in our lives. Castration is unnecessary but we need to let education and the market decide, not Big Corp lobbyists and government bureaucrats.

In a totally related irony, it is our dear friends at Pfizer that make little blue pills for erectile dysfunction. Our big boar Spot has no problem with this either.

And if that wasn’t more than you wanted to hear about boar balls, click through to the links for long evenings of reading…

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy Certified Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


This web site looks worst in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 under Microsoft Windows. Gee... Any coincidence? If you are having trouble, might I suggest getting FireFox, Opera, Safari, iCab or some other browser. Anything but Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 under Microsoft Windows. *grrr* If you are using another browser and have problems, please do let me know.