[There was a server crash and failed hard drive at VONetwork.com which hosts my web site. This caused the loss of the original of this post along with a day of email. I have recreated the opening of this post below. Unfortunately the rest is lost. Do go read Elanor’s article. -WJ]
Elanor has an excellent post about her trip to the National Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement hearings. This is a most disturbing proposal that could wipe out small vegetable farmers like the USDA’s proposed National Animal Identification system would do for small livestock farmers. All of this is to benefit the big producers, exporters and bureaucrats.
[Google Cache comes through! I found the original article text and it is added below. -WJ]
Elanor has an excellent post about her trip to the National Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement hearings. This is a most disturbing proposal that could wipe out small vegetable farmers like the USDA’s proposed National Animal Identification system would do for small livestock farmers. All of this is to benefit the big producers, exporters and bureaucrats.
Starting this week, the USDA’s Ag Marketing Service began a series of hearings around the country (schedule) to determine whether it should move forward with helping the industry develop this proposal. If it goes through, the national LGMA would create a set of farming, shipping and manufacturing practices that would ostensibly reduce the presence of pathogens like E. coli 0157:H7 in leafy greens. Companies that sign on to the agreement would get audited by the USDA to verify that they’re complying.
Marketing agreements are voluntary, meaning that only the industry players who want to sign on become parties to it. If a signatory company passes the audit, they can display a USDA seal on their packaging. But in this case, the agreement can only be signed by handlers – companies that get greens from farmers and store, ship or process them. If they sign on, they are only allowed to buy products from farmers that comply with the on-farm part of the NLGMA requirements and get audited.
So while it’s voluntary for handlers, if you’re a farmer selling to a handler who signs it, the agreement becomes mandatory by proxy for you.
The goal of these hearings, as advertised, is to help AMS decide whether or not a national marketing agreement for leafy greens is worth pursuing. If it gives the green light, then the industry will establish advisory committees and review boards and start putting together the nuts and bolts of the agreement, including the list of practices required of participants. So now is the time for public comment — anyone who shows up to testify is allowed to offer their opinion for the record.
-Ethicurean
Go read the full article and consider that this is one more axe aimed at not just independent farmers, but also the consumers who want to buy locally. They call it voluntary but will gradually squeeze the thumbs screws shut, locking out small farmers.
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”
-Thomas Jefferson
[Update: See this link for Part II of Elanor’s report. -WJ]
