January 24, 2009

R-CalfUSA Speaks for Us to USDA’s Vilsack

General — walterj 7:01 am

[R-CALFUSA, so often on the correct side of issues, has written the following to our new leader of the USDA. Hopefully with new leadership we can get more sensible policies. You can contact the new Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, via email. Keep it brief, polite and to the point. -WJ]

Group Urges Vilsack to Immediately Redress 3 Rulemaking Blunders by Bush USDA

January 20, 2009 Washington, D.C. – Today, former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack was confirmed to be this nation’s next Agriculture Secretary, and R-CALF USA wasted no time in sending Vilsack a formal letter not only to congratulate him on his confirmation, but also to seek his immediate assistance in redressing three fundamental rulemaking-related blunders made by the previous Administration and the previous U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

R-CALF USA members have literally expended millions of dollars over the past several years to fund our intense, heated fight against the previous Administration’s efforts to: 1) willfully expose U.S. consumers and the U.S. cattle herd to an unnecessary and avoidable risk of BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease); 2) prevent U.S. cattle producers from distinguishing beef produced exclusively from their cattle – born, raised and slaughtered in the United States; and, 3) dismantle historically successful disease prevention and control programs and to substitute them with an unproven, intrusive and ill-conceived National Animal Identification System (NAIS) scheme that constitutes a national premises registration for private property, both personal (i.e., livestock) and real (i.e., land).

Specifically, R-CALF USA urged Vilsack to take the following actions within the first few days of President Barack Obama’s Administration:

* Fully rescind the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS’) rulemaking in Docket No. APHIS-2006-0041, commonly known as the over-30-month rule (OTM Rule). The agency’s own risk modeling predicts that the OTM Rule will result in the introduction of between 19 and 105 BSE-infected Canadian cattle, resulting in two to 75 BSE infections of U.S. cattle over the next 20 years. R-CALF USA, the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association, five national consumer groups and several individual ranchers won a preliminary injunction in U.S. district court on July 3, 2008, that required the agency to reopen the rulemaking for this docket. The new rulemaking is Docket No. APHIS 2008-0093, and no final agency action is evident in the Federal Register.

* Modify the Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS’) final rule for mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL), in Docket No. AMS-LS-07-0081, which is scheduled to take effect March 16, 2009. The final rule defies Congress’ intent to distinguish meat produced from animals exclusively born, raised and slaughtered in the United States with a USA label. Instead, the final rule allows meatpackers to mislabel beef exclusively of U.S. origin with a mixed-origin label (e.g., “Product of the United States, Canada, and Mexico”) if the meatpacker responsible for making an origin declaration commingles any amount of meat derived from imported cattle during the meatpackers’ production day. In addition, the final rule improperly limits commodities subject to labeling requirements if the commodity undergoes minor processing.

* Rescind all actions by APHIS to register the premises of livestock owners under the agency’s proposed NAIS, including the agency’s Veterinary Services Memorandum No. 575.19 dated Dec. 22, 2008, and the agency’s Jan. 13, 2009, proposed rule in Docket No. APHIS 2007-0096. Together, these actions usurp Congress’ authority by effectively mandating NAIS participation, including premises registration, by producers that participate in any number of federal disease programs.

“APHIS is trampling over the rights of U.S. livestock owners and the states in its attempt to compile a national registry of individuals’ premises and their livestock,” wrote R-CALF USA President/Region VI Director Max Thornsberry, a veterinarian who also chairs the group’s animal health committee. “R-CALF USA looks forward to working with you to improve APHIS’ ability to control disease outbreaks in a manner that is more cost-effective than NAIS and that does not intrude on the rights of independent cattle producers.

“Fundamental changes are needed in the agency you now lead, and R-CALF USA looks forward to working with you to accomplish the goal of re-establishing USDA as an agency that furthers U.S. agriculture by properly balancing the interests of agricultural producers, food consumers, and industry agribusinesses,” Thornsberry said.

“The U.S. cattle industry and U.S. consumers would benefit greatly by the three actions described above,” he added.

“It is our belief that USDA’s severely damaged credibility, which resulted from the agency’s irresponsible pursuits described in each of the forgoing requests, would be substantially restored if these matters were to be expeditiously addressed under your leadership,” Thornsberry concluded. “R-CALF USA has submitted comprehensive comments on each of these issues to the agency. We are available to meet with you and/or your staff at your convenience to further discuss the urgent need for these actions.”

Note: To view/download the letter to Vilsack, please visit www.r-calfusa.com/090120-UrgentPrioritiesForUSDAFinal.pdf.

# # #

R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) is a national, non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on trade and marketing issues. Members are located across 47 states and are primarily cow/calf operators, cattle backgrounders, and/or feedlot owners. R-CALF USA directors and committee chairs are extremely active unpaid volunteers. R-CALF USA has dozens of affiliate organizations and various main-street businesses are associate members. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com or, call 406-252-2516.

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy All Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


January 22, 2009

Blog Problems with VON - Again

Blog Notes — walterj 7:00 am

Blog Problems with VON - Again

20090124.0800 - Cecilia noticed my blog post and contacted me. VON has made repairs. Things are improving. Although things are still not working smoothy and I’m finding places where data was lost I’m cautiously optamistic that the site is back. Some incoming email and comments were lost as well as two posts so if I didn’t respond to you, contact me again.

20090125.1128 - Test: If this appears then my web site is working once again.

20090127.1706 - I’m still having problems with some of my domains not functioning on VON.

20090128.0739 - Problems continue. It has now been seven days since I first reported the problems to technical support and the original problems are not yet fixed.

20090129.0749 - All problems seem to be resolved.

20090205.0348 - Not all is well. I’m still getting intermittent site failures that bring down the web sites and email. This latest time all of VON/4HostHelp seemed to go down too. Not a good sign.

I’ve had a bad day. This is a rant. This is not a rant about the USDA, government or technology. This is a rant about bad service.

VON is my web host. They also go under the name of Vision Online Networking, VONetwork, Vonetwork.com, Vonetwork.net, LiveWired, Cecilia Hanif and who knows what else. This is where you connect to when you call up one of my blogs.

VON used to be a very good web hosting service. The operative tense is in the past. It was sold some time, about a year or more ago. Since then the quality of service has greatly declined. I STRONGLY recommend NOT using VONetwork.

At this point I am extremely pissed with them. They have wasted a large part of my day. They did this for several days back in December. Again earlier in the fall and several times periodically before that since they’ve taken over what used to be an excellent web host.

The latest problem was that back in December they moved my server, with virtually no notice. At that time they asked me to update my nameservers, the info that directs your request for NoNAIS.org to the appropriate web server. Today it stopped working. Again. I contacted them and a different person at VON had me switch the nameservers. Apparently she had me switch back to the old server. The result being that for a while it appeared that everything since mid-December was lost and all the mail since then came in to me in duplicate loading down my network and local disk space forcing me to sort through it again.

To say I’m pissed is to put it mildly. VON is screwing up over and over again. I need to switch to a new web hosting company but my problem is lack of time. So, who ever is responsible for the number of hours in a day, please increase it.

Another issue is that I pre-paid VON, just before they changed hands, for a multi-year contract. Don’t do that. Now that they have my money they apparently have no incentive to provide excellence in service. I hold no power in negotiations, other than to write here about how badly they are treating me. So buyer beware, don’t pre-buy, especially not from VON or any of their associated businesses or people.

The other problem is that I’ve been through this before, twice, with other web hosting companies since the early ’90s. They’re great for five or ten years and then they get sold or graduate from college and the service goes down hill. This means that simply switching to another web hosting company is not a total solution. It just puts the problem off again for a few years.

*sign*

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy All Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


January 21, 2009

USDA Did Listen - Naturally Raised

News — walterj 11:08 am

This morning the USDA published the new Naturally Raised regulations, something we’ve discussed here before. Turns out they did listen to comments in some regards. In the original regulations it had banned feeding “animal by-products” but not made clear what that meant?

My guess was the concern was regarding the feeding of cows to cows, slaughter wastes, that is believed to have produced Mad Cow Disease a.k.a. BSE. The problem was that the way it was worded could ban the feeding of dairy and eggs to pigs which is a good practice and perfectly natural - pigs are omnivores. In fact, pigs and chickens both will eat meat in the wild making just about anything fair game for them.

If the definition of animal by-products had been made so limited it would have conflicted with the pre-existing Certified Naturally Grown program which is parallel to the USDA Certified Organic standards.

In the federal registry this morning I found the final ruling on Naturally Raised marketing claims by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). You can read the full text in the Federal Registry. The part relevant to the above discussion is quoted here:

The only diet requirement addressed in the proposed standard was that livestock have never been fed mammalian or avian by-products. Many commenters expressed support for this requirement; however, numerous commenters asked that the definition of animal by-products be clarified. Some commenters asserted that pigs were omnivores and that eggs and milk were commonly used in pigs’ diet and requested that the requirement of no mammalian and avian derived products be clarified to prohibit slaughter by- products but not food items such as eggs and milk in the porcine diet. Some commenters also suggested aquatic by- products be prohibited.

Agency Response: As stated previously, the only diet requirement addressed in the proposed standard was that livestock have never been fed mammalian or avian by-products. After reviewing the comments received suggesting the clarification of the definition of mammalian and avian by- products, AMS has determined to revise the standard to clarify the definition of animal by-product to specifically state what is prohibited. For the purpose of the Naturally Raised Marketing Claim standard, AMS will prohibit animal (mammalian, avian, and aquatic) by- products derived from the slaughter/ harvest processes including meat and fat, animal waste materials (e.g., manure and litter), and aquatic by-products (e.g., fishmeal and fish oil). This prohibition includes meat by-products as defined by FSIS in 9 CFR 301.2. Mammalian and avian products (e.g., milk and eggs) that are not derived from the slaughter/ harvest processes are allowed.
-Naturally Raised in Federal Registry

This is good news. Thank you AMS. I appreciate that the government regulators took our concerns into account and have made meaningful and reasonable changes and clarifications to the regulations they had proposed in late 2007.

Unfortunately the news is not all good. Big Ag with its Confinement Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) can get away with calling their production “Naturally Raised” if they simply make minor feed and medication changes:

All products labeled with a naturally raised marketing claim must incorporate information explicitly stating that animals have been raised in a manner that meets the following conditions:

  • (1) No growth promotants were administered to the animals;
  • (2) no antibiotics (other than ionophores used to prevent parasitism) were administered to the animal; and
  • (3) no animal by-products were fed to the animals. If ionophores used only to prevent parasitism were administered to the animals, they may be labeled with the naturally raised marketing claims if that fact is explicitly noted.

-Naturally Raised in Federal Registry

A great many people, including myself, had left comment asking that management, humane handling and access to grazing should be included as part of the standard. An animal raised in confinement in a small pen or even “free-ranged” in a factory farm barn is certainly not naturally raised and should not get to use the term competing with animals that were truly raised naturally on pasture.

Unfortunately the USDA chose not to do this. Instead their rule will allow Tyson and other Big Ag factory farm producers to simply make small adjustments in their feeding to qualify for using the label “Naturally Raised” in their marketing. When a consumer thinks “Naturally Raised” they envision pastures, not steel bars, pens and confinement stalls.

Once again, just like with Organic, the big boys are stealing, dilluting and destroying the good that small producers have been using to differentiate themselves from the factory farm production model of agriculture.

AMS determined that it was not appropriate to expand the scope of this standard to incorporate the diverse range of suggested practices or attributes into the naturally raised standard. Furthermore, attempting to broaden the list of practices or attributes incorporated in a standard to be applied on a nationwide basis would be inherently difficult as practices vary from region to region and by producer. Due to the geographic diversity of the United States, livestock production practices vary considerably due to soils, climate, and availability of the production inputs and other necessities such as shelter, feedstuffs, and labor. AMS concluded that many of the production activities identified through the comment process would be more appropriately addressed as standards themselves or incorporated into other more encompassing standards or marketing programs that they would be more appropriately associated with.
-Naturally Raised in Federal Registry

One step back, one step forward, tango we must as we dance with the USDA regulators and Big Ag.

Pastured Pigs & Piglets
Healthy, happy All Naturally Grown piglets to raise yourself or we'll do it for you delivered to the butcher.
SugarMtnFarm.com

 

Personal Pencil Portraits
Exquisite hand drawing from your photo. Visit my online gallery to see examples.
HollyGraphicArt.com


« Previous PageNext Page »
This web site looks worst in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 under Microsoft Windows. Gee... Any coincidence? If you are having trouble, might I suggest getting FireFox, Opera, Safari, iCab or some other browser. Anything but Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 under Microsoft Windows. *grrr* If you are using another browser and have problems, please do let me know.