NoNAIS.org

In Australia they have 11,000,000 non-existant “phantom” cattle in their system. Farmers are being trapped by errors in the National Livestock Identification System (NLIS) in Australia and then being cheated out of the payment for their hard work. Now in Europe we have the story of a sheep tagging disaster…

ELECTRONIC identification of sheep could be as disastrous to Welsh farming as bluetongue and bovine TB, industry leaders believe. NFU Cymru vice president Ed Bailey fears the EU plans could leave the Welsh countryside bereft of its most potent symbol – sheep. He said the high costs of implementing electronic identification (EID) would cripple the Welsh sheep sector and force many farmers out of the industry.

“It is estimated that EID cost farmers £6 per head in the first year, knocking about 40% off their incomes overnight,” he said. “I do worry about the long-term impact on farming incomes and the possibility that many producers will simply not afford to carry on. “It could have a profound effect on the Welsh countryside as we know it.”

The industry is fighting a rearguard action against the plans, due to come into force in January 2010.
Unions still hope to secure a derogation for Britain, Europe’s main sheep-producing nation, but attempts to allow the voluntary introduction of EID have so far ended in failure.

The Farmers Union of Wales said the topic is high on the agenda on the summer show circuit. At tomorrow’s Denbigh & Flint county show farmers will be invited to sign the union’s online petition opposing the introduction of compulsory EID.

FUW Denbighshire chairman Glyn Jones said the regulation would amount to an additional tax on European sheep producers.

He said: “With money being lost on every sheep, the extra cost of tagging, coupled with the extra time taken to conform with the legislation, will simply add to those losses.”

EID trials are on-going on 14 farms in Wales, but results have not been encouraging. Older farmers have struggled with the equipment, while the hardware and software produced by different companies has often been found to be incompatible. EID readers struggled to work in cold and wet conditions, and at markets and abattoirs equipment suffered electrical interference. At one of the country’s largest abattoirs, a study found that, in perfect conditions, the equipment had a 93% success rate. It meant that, if EID was implemented, seven in every 100 sheep would have to be written off – probably more.

Derek Morgan, FUW hill farming committee chairman, has unsuccessfully trialled EID on some sheep at his Powys farm. He said: “It would be uneconomical to use the system on my commercial hill flock.”

“It could lead to land abandonment in some of Wales’ most sensitive areas as the industry plays a vital role in maintaining our landscape,” he said.

FUW vice president Glyn Roberts has an ongoing petition on the Prime Minister’s website at http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/sheepEID/
-DailyPost UK

Our beloved government wants push us to NAIS, if we don’t volunteer they will make it mandatory. A mandatory disaster that will favor the mega-producers and destroy small farmers.

Hat tip to Darol.

From comments:
This is of interest to USA folks in all states, not just Ohio.

This is from a columnist who covers ag issues for the Mount Vernon (Ohio) News. It is the final two paragraphs of a long article, “Join the Ohio NAIS rebellion,” 08/16/08. The author is Arthur Bolduc. This column is not included in the newspaper’s website. If you’d like to contact the paper and ask them to put Mr. Bolduc’s articles online, please check out the contact forms at mountvernonnews.com.

——

“On Tuesday, Aug. 19, Ohio livestock owners will have an unprecendented opportunity to address Collin Peterson as he comes to Ohio looking for more money and support to promote NAIS. He has already squandered 120 million of our tax dollars and has petitioned U. S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, for $24 million more. Let’s put a stop to this waste of our hard-earned money, demand an accounting of money spent and Peterson’s resignation.

“Collin Peterson and his Corporatocracy can be confronted Aug. 19 at Ohio University, Zanesville Campus, Newark Road at 7:30 a.m., and again at the Olde Dutch Restaurant, 12789 S.R. 664 in Logan at 10:30 a.m. The last stop on his hit-and-run tour is the Ross County Service Center on Western Avenue in Chillicothe at 1:30 p.m.

“Get up early Aug. 19 and come join the NAIS REbellion Ohio.”

Hat tip to JDJones, Esbee

Some of the many problems with RFID are that it broadcasts data, is often re-writable and can be so easily hacked and mimicked. Our beloved despots, er, I mean leerless feaders, have repeatedly brought out supposedly “secure” passports and national ID’s that were subsequently quickly hacked. The latest news from England is just one more in the series.

What is especially scary is the government’s actually rely on these unreliable methods. Not only will they miss the real terrorists and criminals but they nab innocent people in their nets.

New microchipped passports designed to be foolproof against identity theft can be cloned and manipulated in minutes and accepted as genuine by the computer software recommended for use at international airports.

Tests for The Times exposed security flaws in the microchips introduced to protect against terrorism and organised crime. The flaws also undermine claims that 3,000 blank passports stolen last week were worthless because they could not be forged.

In the tests, a computer researcher cloned the chips on two British passports and implanted digital images of Osama bin Laden and a suicide bomber. The altered chips were then passed as genuine by passport reader software used by the UN agency that sets standards for e-passports.

The Home Office has always argued that faked chips would be spotted at border checkpoints because they would not match key codes when checked against an international data-base. But only ten of the forty-five countries with e-passports have signed up to the Public Key Directory (PKD) code system, and only five are using it. Britain is a member but will not use the directory before next year. Even then, the system will be fully secure only if every e-passport country has joined.

Some of the 45 countries, including Britain, swap codes manually, but criminals could use fake e-passports from countries that do not share key codes, which would then go undetected at passport control.

The tests suggest that if the microchips are vulnerable to cloning then bogus biometrics could be inserted in fake or blank passports.

Tens of millions of microchipped passports have been issued by the 45 countries in the belief that they will make international travel safer. They contain a tiny radio frequency chip and antenna attached to the inside back page. A special electronic reader sends out an encrypted signal and the chip responds by sending back the holder’s ID and biometric details.

Britain introduced e-passports in March 2006. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, the United States demanded that other countries adopt biometric passports. Many of the 9/11 bombers had travelled on fake passports.

The tests for The Times were conducted by Jeroen van Beek, a security researcher at the University of Amsterdam. Building on research from the UK, Germany and New Zealand, Mr van Beek has developed a method of reading, cloning and altering microchips so that they are accepted as genuine by Golden Reader, the standard software used by the International Civil Aviation Organisation to test them. It is also the software recommended for use at airports.

Using his own software, a publicly available programming code, a £40 card reader and two £10 RFID chips, Mr van Beek took less than an hour to clone and manipulate two passport chips to a level at which they were ready to be planted inside fake or stolen paper passports.

A baby boy’s passport chip was altered to contain an image of Osama bin Laden, and the passport of a 36-year-old woman was changed to feature a picture of Hiba Darghmeh, a Palestinian suicide bomber who killed three people in 2003. The unlikely identities were chosen so that there could be no suggestion that either Mr van Beek or The Times was faking viable travel documents.

“We’re not claiming that terrorists are able to do this to all passports today or that they will be able to do it tomorrow,” Mr van Beek said. “But it does raise concerns over security that need to be addressed in a more public and open way.”

The tests also raise serious questions about the Government’s £4 billion identity card scheme, which relies on the same biometric technology. ID cards are expected to contain similar microchips that will store up to 50 pieces of personal and biometric information about their holders. Last night Dominic Grieve, the Shadow Home Secretary, called on ministers to take urgent action to remedy the security flaws discovered by The Times. “It is of deep concern that the technology underpinning a key part of the UK’s security can be compromised so easily,” he said.

The ability to clone chips leaves travellers vulnerable to identity theft when they surrender their passports at hotels or car rental companies. Criminals in the back office could read the chips and clone them. The original passport holder’s name and date of birth could be left on the fake chip, with the picture, fingerprints and other biometric data of a criminal client added. The criminal could then travel the world using the stolen identity and the original passport holder would be none the wiser.
-Times Online

If they can’t secure REAL ID and passports then obviously NAIS is flawed as well.