<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDC Plans NPIS</title>
	<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/</link>
	<description>Protect our traditional rights to farm</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sean</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-548085</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-548085</guid>
					<description>Beware the stooges who will try to rationalize the government propaganda. There is no conspiracy because by definition the government isn't a conspiracy. Or so the thinking goes. They are still out to empty your pockets and control you. That is the reality of government and why our founding fathers put such strict limits on government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware the stooges who will try to rationalize the government propaganda. There is no conspiracy because by definition the government isn&#8217;t a conspiracy. Or so the thinking goes. They are still out to empty your pockets and control you. That is the reality of government and why our founding fathers put such strict limits on government.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Breederville</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-14652</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-14652</guid>
					<description>The buzzword for the human chipping is ICT.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/roundtabict_en.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Conference on the ethical considerations of Human Implanting

PDF download.  87 pages with graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buzzword for the human chipping is ICT.</p>
<p><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/roundtabict_en.pdf" rel="nofollow">Conference on the ethical considerations of Human Implanting</p>
<p>PDF download.  87 pages with graphics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hiedi</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7606</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7606</guid>
					<description>The plague is definitely real here in Colorado. Those cases were very real and one even here where I live in the Grand Junction/Whitewater area. We have prairie dogs in abundance in our desert valley and they are infected with bubonic plague. My cousins teacher caught the bubonic plague LAST YEAR (2005). She is alive today but it was a close call. There have been others around here that have gotten it for several years now. Sometimes it is relaesed and some times it is not. Our media here tries to inform people when they can but they are also dissuaded to. There are some that will report it anyway. 

 Animals like dogs and cats have gotten the bubonic plague here - it is called Rodent plague when the vets will admit to anything of a plague at all. Rodent Plague = Bubonic Plague. 

Nancy #23 should read everything and use common sense to deduct the seriousness of the issues discussed on this page or the things said at the top. If you will note Nancy it was stated right below that it was made up but that it should be taken into consideration and for what reasons. 

Several YEARS ago the option to have your BABY microchipped before leaving the hospital after birth was an option given to parents. Soon it will be done with or without your permission. I was born at home and so are the children in our church so we do not have that worry - but it will present others to us. 

But Eric #25 is correct - there will be deaths for those who do not comply. Maybe not in the next 10 years. Maybe not in 20 yrs. Or maybe in 5 yrs. They will do what they want.

 WE have to choose where we stand and stand true. People are next - and people are already being chipped voluntarily. Soon, as with all things, it will be mandatory. The choice is our own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plague is definitely real here in Colorado. Those cases were very real and one even here where I live in the Grand Junction/Whitewater area. We have prairie dogs in abundance in our desert valley and they are infected with bubonic plague. My cousins teacher caught the bubonic plague LAST YEAR (2005). She is alive today but it was a close call. There have been others around here that have gotten it for several years now. Sometimes it is relaesed and some times it is not. Our media here tries to inform people when they can but they are also dissuaded to. There are some that will report it anyway. </p>
<p> Animals like dogs and cats have gotten the bubonic plague here - it is called Rodent plague when the vets will admit to anything of a plague at all. Rodent Plague = Bubonic Plague. </p>
<p>Nancy #23 should read everything and use common sense to deduct the seriousness of the issues discussed on this page or the things said at the top. If you will note Nancy it was stated right below that it was made up but that it should be taken into consideration and for what reasons. </p>
<p>Several YEARS ago the option to have your BABY microchipped before leaving the hospital after birth was an option given to parents. Soon it will be done with or without your permission. I was born at home and so are the children in our church so we do not have that worry - but it will present others to us. </p>
<p>But Eric #25 is correct - there will be deaths for those who do not comply. Maybe not in the next 10 years. Maybe not in 20 yrs. Or maybe in 5 yrs. They will do what they want.</p>
<p> WE have to choose where we stand and stand true. People are next - and people are already being chipped voluntarily. Soon, as with all things, it will be mandatory. The choice is our own.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7498</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7498</guid>
					<description>There will be casualties in this war for freedom. We need to get that in our heads. Chose sides then ACT. Bloodshed has always been spilled to keep us Free. I see no difference in this issue as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be casualties in this war for freedom. We need to get that in our heads. Chose sides then ACT. Bloodshed has always been spilled to keep us Free. I see no difference in this issue as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Linda</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7165</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-7165</guid>
					<description>Verichip made in Florida. SCARY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verichip made in Florida. SCARY
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nancy E Phillips</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6975</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6975</guid>
					<description>Dear Walter,
I signed onto your No-NAIS site to hopefully keep up with the current events of NAIS.  I am now, however, totally disillusioned with your site because of the posting of the CDC &amp; NPIS letter.  It's completely hokey and it totally discredits your site.  Do you plan to continue these type posts?  If so, I will not be needing your update feeds. 
Please let me know if I need to unsubscribe.
Nancy

&lt;i&gt;[Nancy, There is nothing hokey about the CDC article. The plague is 100% real. I received that article from them. NAIS is justified on less than the threat of the plague yet they are planning to take away our basic rights, freedoms and privacy. If they will do that on less threat then the plague then how soon until they start justifying tagging and tracking of people. When will they justify depopulation of people based on the greater 'social good'. By the way, you do know about REAL ID I hope. That is a system like NAIS for people - they just don't call it NPIS. REAL ID is a system they are trying to put through for tagging and tracking people. Cheers, -WJ]&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Walter,<br />
I signed onto your No-NAIS site to hopefully keep up with the current events of NAIS.  I am now, however, totally disillusioned with your site because of the posting of the CDC &#038; NPIS letter.  It&#8217;s completely hokey and it totally discredits your site.  Do you plan to continue these type posts?  If so, I will not be needing your update feeds.<br />
Please let me know if I need to unsubscribe.<br />
Nancy</p>
<p><i>[Nancy, There is nothing hokey about the CDC article. The plague is 100% real. I received that article from them. NAIS is justified on less than the threat of the plague yet they are planning to take away our basic rights, freedoms and privacy. If they will do that on less threat then the plague then how soon until they start justifying tagging and tracking of people. When will they justify depopulation of people based on the greater &#8217;social good&#8217;. By the way, you do know about REAL ID I hope. That is a system like NAIS for people - they just don&#8217;t call it NPIS. REAL ID is a system they are trying to put through for tagging and tracking people. Cheers, -WJ]</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kathy</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6960</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6960</guid>
					<description>&amp;#38; the passenger pigeons darkened the skies for hundreds of sq. miles, their roosting sights destroyed by their droppings.  They were not decimated by humans but their thinned flocks had adapted to a way of life that could not sustain in lowered numbers.  They were a pandemic waiting to happen.
And all these years we have been so shamed (as members of a species) for their demise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&amp; the passenger pigeons darkened the skies for hundreds of sq. miles, their roosting sights destroyed by their droppings.  They were not decimated by humans but their thinned flocks had adapted to a way of life that could not sustain in lowered numbers.  They were a pandemic waiting to happen.<br />
And all these years we have been so shamed (as members of a species) for their demise.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Breederville</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6948</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6948</guid>
					<description>That PDF file really cross checks to the Data2010 database at the CDC

Read more here
&lt;a href=&quot;http://nationalpropertyowners.org/CFRInfo.html&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That PDF file really cross checks to the Data2010 database at the CDC</p>
<p>Read more here<br />
<a href="http://nationalpropertyowners.org/CFRInfo.html">link</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maggie</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6925</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6925</guid>
					<description>Scott, your comment about controlling food was right on the mark I think. A few years before NAFTA passed I was told by a very reliable individual that part of the long term plan for our country was to &quot;urbanize it&quot; and squeeze out the farmers. Then eventually most of the food would be imported and as I recall the words were &quot;Then we can controll them with food.&quot; Naturally we=government and them=us. It was a statement made by a rep. to a dem. who was himself a farmer. That particular man who considered himself a farmer first and a politican second was horrified. As was I. In fact at the time I didn't believe they would do that. Now I do. The tagging of animals is just another step. They have already taken several on their path to wipe out small farmers (and American manufactering by the way)From what I can see the Dem. party is as guilty as the Rep. one. Distorting enviromental issues is a favorite tactic I think. For instance they ran many of the small farmers out of Oregon with the spotted owl story. The American public was grossly misinformed about that. The forests they called old growth averaged 40- 50 years old. The entire time the real old growth timber was being shipped out of Coos Bay to Japan by the ship load and no one protested that. But I guess no one was paying any one to protest that. After the loggers and mill workers lost their jobs the local economy crashed and many other jobs were lost. Most of those people owned small farms which they lost. The farms were bought (cheaply) and subdivided by land developers who sold $200,000 homes to Californians mostly. No one protested that either. Many mills went to Mexico which is why you can still buy plywood. I am not sure why the price of lumber did not drop then because in Mexico the lumber companies do not have to spend money for pollution control and just dump everything out on the ground. They don't do impact studies or follow any of the enviromental laws they did here. And the workers only get paid the going rate for 1 live chicken per day. They no longer pay social security or 401ks or insurance or overtime or vacation. They don't have any kind of safety or enviromental regulations to follow. The workers are treated very unfairly and subjected to dangerous situations and chemicals. I allways wondered why no one protested all the enviromental and human abuses that happen there. But again, I guess no one paid them to. A few years later they started in on the ranchers saying they were ruining the BLM ground by running too many cattle on it. The cattle were muddying up the streams. No one ever mentioned that 150 years ago there were hundreds of thousands of Buffalo in herds miles long running on that same ground and that they also muddied up a few water holes and even drowned and decayed in the streams by the hundreds every spring when the floods came. Some how the earth kept turning. Now go to the Boise area and see how many new homes have been built on land that a few years ago was ranch land. Some how a subdivision with it's paved streets, side walks and high interest loans  is not as disruptive to the ecology as a farm I guess. Nobody protested the building of houses on the same land the cattle were &quot;destroying&quot; a few years earlier. I don't know about you but I kinda' see a pattern here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, your comment about controlling food was right on the mark I think. A few years before NAFTA passed I was told by a very reliable individual that part of the long term plan for our country was to &#8220;urbanize it&#8221; and squeeze out the farmers. Then eventually most of the food would be imported and as I recall the words were &#8220;Then we can controll them with food.&#8221; Naturally we=government and them=us. It was a statement made by a rep. to a dem. who was himself a farmer. That particular man who considered himself a farmer first and a politican second was horrified. As was I. In fact at the time I didn&#8217;t believe they would do that. Now I do. The tagging of animals is just another step. They have already taken several on their path to wipe out small farmers (and American manufactering by the way)From what I can see the Dem. party is as guilty as the Rep. one. Distorting enviromental issues is a favorite tactic I think. For instance they ran many of the small farmers out of Oregon with the spotted owl story. The American public was grossly misinformed about that. The forests they called old growth averaged 40- 50 years old. The entire time the real old growth timber was being shipped out of Coos Bay to Japan by the ship load and no one protested that. But I guess no one was paying any one to protest that. After the loggers and mill workers lost their jobs the local economy crashed and many other jobs were lost. Most of those people owned small farms which they lost. The farms were bought (cheaply) and subdivided by land developers who sold $200,000 homes to Californians mostly. No one protested that either. Many mills went to Mexico which is why you can still buy plywood. I am not sure why the price of lumber did not drop then because in Mexico the lumber companies do not have to spend money for pollution control and just dump everything out on the ground. They don&#8217;t do impact studies or follow any of the enviromental laws they did here. And the workers only get paid the going rate for 1 live chicken per day. They no longer pay social security or 401ks or insurance or overtime or vacation. They don&#8217;t have any kind of safety or enviromental regulations to follow. The workers are treated very unfairly and subjected to dangerous situations and chemicals. I allways wondered why no one protested all the enviromental and human abuses that happen there. But again, I guess no one paid them to. A few years later they started in on the ranchers saying they were ruining the BLM ground by running too many cattle on it. The cattle were muddying up the streams. No one ever mentioned that 150 years ago there were hundreds of thousands of Buffalo in herds miles long running on that same ground and that they also muddied up a few water holes and even drowned and decayed in the streams by the hundreds every spring when the floods came. Some how the earth kept turning. Now go to the Boise area and see how many new homes have been built on land that a few years ago was ranch land. Some how a subdivision with it&#8217;s paved streets, side walks and high interest loans  is not as disruptive to the ecology as a farm I guess. Nobody protested the building of houses on the same land the cattle were &#8220;destroying&#8221; a few years earlier. I don&#8217;t know about you but I kinda&#8217; see a pattern here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harriette Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6921</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://NoNAIS.org/2006/08/27/cdc-plans-npis/#comment-6921</guid>
					<description>.....and who's to say that newborn babies aren't already chipped.......think about it...hmmmm?

Excellent, Walter - as always ~
hkj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..and who&#8217;s to say that newborn babies aren&#8217;t already chipped&#8230;&#8230;.think about it&#8230;hmmmm?</p>
<p>Excellent, Walter - as always ~<br />
hkj
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

